FA Cup verdict: Stoke City 3 Manchester City 1 (aet)

25th February 2010

Goals: Bellamy 81 for City. Kitson 79, Shawcross 95, Tuncay 99 for Stoke.

A failure to take chances saw City crash out of the FA Cup in extra-time, with the harsh dismissal of Emmanuel Adebayor by card happy Steve Bennett in the second period giving Stoke the advantage. The pressure will be turned up on Roberto Mancini even though he can hardly be blamed for the squandering of numerous chances.

The manager was true to his word in selecting a physically strong line-up – particularly at the back – to combat Stoke’s style. Micah Richards came in at right-back, and there was a real surprise with Nedum Onuoha coming in alongside Joleon Lescott, while Vincent Kompany moved into midfield.

The diminutive de Jong dropped to the bench, while Zabaleta added a competitive edge to the right flank. With Craig Bellamy on the left and Adebayor continuing his improved form, we were able to dominate the opening period.

It was a marked contrast to early siege of last week, with a subdued Stoke unable to get past Kompany, never mind our back-four. All that was required was for City to take their chances.

Barry missed an early one. Onuoha saw the ball land at his feet from a corner, but stabbed it wide. Adebayor played in both Ireland and Bellamy. Stevie took a first touch in his stride but then saw his shot blocked.

Bellamy had no excuses. With only Sorenson to beat, a poor first touch made for an easy save. The complete lack of form between Ireland and Bellamy became increasingly apparent as a promising start, crucially, wasn’t capitalised on. We could have had four by the interval, but went in with none.

Stoke could only get better, and during the second half they started lobbing trademark high balls into our box. The defence was holding firm, but our passing became very sloppy. Simply keeping the ball in play seemed to be beyond several players of supposedly superior technique.

As a consequence, Stoke were allowed to gain some momentum and the substitute Kitson duly scored after playing a one-two, with Bridge not getting tight enough.

Trouble appeared to be in the offing, but we responded almost immediately with Adebayor setting up Bellamy to rifle home. The Welshman’s celebrations, like his performance, seemed muted.

It was Adebayor’s sending-off which really provoked Craig and from then on he looked dangerous. Had he shown this fire in the first half we might well have been ahead and able to see out the tie.

The law really is an ass if Adebayor is banned for three matches. Had he seen red for a terrible challenge, then yes. For punching an opponent, yes. But some of the three match bans we see now are for trifling offences. It happened last season here to Wright-Phillips. Vieira’s flicked foot was inconsequential, deserving of a one match ban at most for retaliation.

With the game against Tottenham due to be rearranged we might not see the Togolese striker till March 29th! Just when he was looking good.

Later, we saw Huth put his arm across Bellamy in a more deliberate way than Adebayor did. The referee gave nothing. At the weekend Fuller stuck his boot into Jamie O’Hara’s groin with more aggression than Vieira showed, yet there was no ban for him. Did Tony Pulis ask for “parity” after these offences? The seemingly arbitrary nature of three match bans is infuriating.

Meanwhile, City comfortably saw out normal time, and in retrospect this was when they should have gone for a win. Unfortunately Santa Cruz was still looking off the pace so a cutting edge was absent. That the next goal went to Stoke therefore shouldn’t have been a surprise. It was still a disappointment.

As in the game at Eastlands, a Delap throw did for us and this time Given was clearly culpable – coming and failing to get the ball. Following on from his clanger at the Britannia Stadium last week, the Irishman is having a poor run.

The contrast between the attacking substitutes of Kitson and Tuncay, and our own Santa Cruz couldn’t have been greater, as the Turk matched his team-mate’s skill and hunger in claiming a well-taken goal. The way he slalomed round defenders and produced a finish was an object lesson to Wright-Phillips, Bellamy and Ireland.

Roque missed a golden chance to pull a goal back with seven minutes of extra time remaining, and there went any lingering hope.

Roberto Mancini:

“I think we dominated the match for long periods.

“We had six or seven chances to score a goal up until Emmanuel was sent off.

“When a striker is being closely marked he wants to make space for himself and this kind of thing can happen – I thought it was a yellow card at the very worst.

“But football is a strange game because we didn’t score when we were on top and then something happens later that completely changes the game.”

To see this season’s hopes of silverware ended at the Britannia is bitterly disapointing and it’s difficult to remain objective. If we do then Mancini can’t be blamed for his selection and tactics going into this game. The defence was solid, moving Kompany into midfield was nearly a masterstroke, and we created enough chances to have the game wrapped up by half-time.

The defeat can be put down to a failure to take chances, a poor passage of play when our passing was woeful, and a refereeing decicion which showed we didn’t have “that bit of luck you need in the cup”. Having said that, we still failed to beat Stoke in three attempts and that doesn’t look good for Roberto.

External reports:

Blog reports:

Video:

FA Cup player ratings: Stoke City v Manchester City

25th February 2010

Given – A critical error in coming out and failing to connect for the second goal. Everything else was ok, but in that moment our chance went. 5

Richards – A whole-hearted display where it was good to see him getting forward after the sending off. Unfortunately Micah’s ability in the final third didn’t match the enthusiasm to get there. 6

Bridge – Wasn’t tight enough on Kitson for the first goal and had a nightmare with his passing. 5

Onuoha – A surprise to see him back, and a welcome one. His calmness in the face of Stoke’s attacks wass a welcome contrast to Toure. 7

Zabaleta – A typically committed performance on the right of midfield before switching to left-back in place of Bridge. We know he’s not creative, but he did his job in keeping Stoke in check. 7

Lescott – Once again solid in defence. His return to the side and return to form shouldn’t be overlooked. 7

Kompany – Commanding in midfield during the early stages, when we should have killed the game. Gave his all throughout. 7

Ireland – Another disappointing showing. Failed to take a chance in the first half and wasn’t able to make any telling passes despite having the space to do so. 5

Barry – Another who missed a first-half chance and failed again to deliver telling passes when we needed them. 6

Adebayor – Beautifully played in both Bellamy and Irland during the first half, and came close to scoring himself with a long-range drive. Looked the man most likely for City until the referee intervened. 7

Bellamy – Biggest culprit of the first-half misses. Nothing was going right for him prior to scoring. Finally looked fired-up after Adebayor’s sending off. 6

Subs:

Wright-Phillips – Provided an attacking outlet down the right flank, but was another who ran the ball out of play with a frustrating frequency. Can hardly expect a pay rise with that habit. 6

Santa Cruz – Stoke subs, Kitson and Tuncay, came on looking hungry and scored. Roque on the other hand still looks off the pace – seven months into the season. Another who missed a good chance. 5

Sylvinho – Could give lessons in how to pass to a team-mate to some of our supposedly creative players.

Man of the match: Vincent Kompany.

FA Cup: Stoke City v Manchester City live on itv.com

24th February 2010

For anyone who isn’t aware, tonight’s FA Cup replay is being shown live on:

http://www.itv.com/sport/football/facup/livevideo/default.html

Teams:

Stoke: Sorensen, Whitehead, Shawcross, Huth, Collins, Lawrence, Whelan, Diao, Delap, Sidibe, Fuller.
Subs: Simonsen, Beattie, Kitson, Pugh, Amdy Faye, Sanli, Davies.
Man City: Given, Richards, Onuoha, Lescott, Bridge, Zabaleta, Ireland, Kompany, Barry, Bellamy, Adebayor.
Subs: Taylor, Wright-Phillips, Santa Cruz, Garrido, Sylvinho, De Jong, Boyata.
Referee: Steve Bennett (Kent)

Verdict: Manchester City 0 Liverpool 0

22nd February 2010

With neither Mancini or Benitez willing to go for broke, Liverpool and City cancelled each other out in a hard fought draw where all the heroes were in defence. It resulted in one shot on target apiece with Adebayor forcing the harder save from Pepe Reina.

Adebayor also came closest to scoring on two other occasions; putting a header from a corner just over, and being tackled at the last by Skrtel on the one occasion he looked to have broken free from the Liverpool back line. This was not a game for the neutrals, yet for those who appreciate a hard fought tactical battle there was something to admire.

With both teams having lost the defensive frailties that plagued their early season form, this was always likely to be a tight affair. Here there were a couple of surprises in the defence selected by Mancini.

Early morning rumours of an injury to Toure saw Kompany restored to the side alongside Lescott. Zabaleta also returned in place of Richards. With all due respect to Kolo, this was the central defensive pairing that many were hoping to see and it didn’t disappoint.

Both in open play and set-pieces Vince and Joleon were dominant. Nigel de Jong looked happy to be seeing the ball on the ground again and was hugely influential in stopping Liverpool playing the ball through the middle. Gerrard was never able to influence the game as a result.

Mancini went for a more attacking midfield featuring Ireland in his favoured role, with Johnson starting on the left and Wright-Phillips on the right. Adebayor was the lone striker and he worked hard despite being constantly outnumbered. During the first half in particular, the Togolese was winning a lot of headers, but none quite fell for City to take maximum advantage.

Adam Johnson demonstrated his fine close control on both flanks, but also bore an unfortunate resemblance to Petrov on an off-day with his erratic deliveries from set-pieces. Gareth Barry used to take many an effective set-piece for Villa and maybe he should be given more opportunities at City.

After Liverpool had territorially dominated the early stages, City steadily came into the game with Johnson showing his skills. Ireland may not be enjoying his best form under Mancini, but he plays a vital role as an attacking midfielder in the absence of Tevez. The midfield had a much better balance, and it showed once we started taking the game to Liverpool.

In an attempt to further test Liverpool, Mancini switched Johnson and Wright-Phillips. Not for the first time this didn’t appear to work. Johnson may be ok on the right wing, but Wright-Phillips looked lost on the left and there was the sense that Carragher wasn’t being subjected to the test he might have been.

Sadly for Wright-Phillips, the wingers were rarely switched back and eventually he made way for Bellamy. The Welshman came on to a great cheer and showed his usual commitment, but there’s no escaping the fact that his attacking form has deserted him at the moment. Several times, he threatened to break through, but never did.

With Johnson tiring badly on the right flank, the chances of City carving open a winner faded. Bringing on Ibrahim for Ireland was a surprise call from Mancini, and didn’t pay off. At the same time, Benitez brought on Torres. With Benayoun already introduced and Aquilani following, the Liverpool manager appeared to be following a game-plan to try and snatch three points in the final portion of the game.

That these attacking substitutes failed to create a single clear opening is a big compliment to our defenders on the day. Torres in particular was quickly frustrated, getting booked for elbowing Lescott and spending his time arguing with the officials.

Gareth Barry:

“Anyone watching the game would sense that neither team wanted to lose. There was so much to lose if the other team got three points. It was very tactical out there.

“Shay Given only had one shot to save, and Pepe Reina only had the one shot from Emmanuel Adebayor. It was just so tight, because nobody on that pitch wanted to lose the game.”

Prior to the game this fixture looked like a must-win if we’re to be confident of remaining in front of an improving Liverpool side. Yet having watched the game, no-one could argue against a draw being a fair result. Even the managers agreed! With Villa and Spurs both winning, the battle for fourth place is now tighter than ever.

Recently, it’s the games we’re expected to dominate, particularly away from home, where Mancini has struggled. Stoke on Wednesday will be another chance to try and rectify this.

The Italian looks happier when having to set his side up to play the bigger teams, and the close tactical battle here was reminiscent of the Carling Cup games against United. That may be just as well given we’re off to Chelsea next Saturday. Let’s hope the defence can continue from this excellent performance, and Tevez will return with his goal-scoring ways.

External reports:

Blog reports:

Player ratings: Manchester City v Liverpool

22nd February 2010

Given – One straightforward save was all that was required as the defence in front of Shay was outstanding. Did well with a series of tricky corners in the first half. 6

Zabaleta – Won some crunching tackles and looked to get forward whenever he could. A big improvement on his recent performances. 7

Kompany – A welcome return for big Vince and he totally dominated the penalty area. 8

Lescott – Looks to be back to full fitness and forged an excellent partnership alongside Kompany. 7

Bridge – A steady if unspectacular game. Defensively sound even if he didn’t manage many of the trademark attacking bursts. 7

de Jong – After the games against Stoke, Nigel looked glad to see the ball back on the floor. Provided an excellent shield, getting stuck into countless tackles. 7

Barry – As one paced as ever, but his form is improving and he retained good positional sense. It would have been good to see Gareth play some of the incisive passes of which he’s capable. They might have made the difference. 6

Ireland – Stevie took a lot of stick, but he was often crowded out. There wasn’t a lot for him to work with, as only the idiosyncratic Adebayor was ahead of him most of the time, and they’re yet to form an understanding. 6

Wright-Phillips – Looked like he was going to have a duel with Insua before Mancini decided to switch him to the left flank. Shaun looks lost over there and it was a shame he never got switched back. 6

A Johnson – Started brightly and was unaffected by the switch of wings. His close control is excellent, but the final ball was often a disappointment. Looked to tire badly in the second half. 6

Adebayor – Playing as a lone striker and target man, Adebayor won a surprising amount of high balls, particularly in the first half. Worked hard even if he wasn’t quite able to break free of the Liverpool marking. 7

Subs:

Bellamy – Came on to a big ovation and ran around but, in all honesty, nothing he attempted came off. Needs to rediscover his attacking form. 6

Ibrahim – A surprise call by Mancini. Abdi took a while to get up to the speed of the game, and it was a long-shot to hope he could make the difference in such a tight match. Managed a long-range shot just before the end. 6

Man of the match: All the heroes were at the back, and Vincent Kompany marshalled the lot of them.

Preview: Manchester City v Liverpool

19th February 2010

Is the visit of Liverpool our biggest league game of the season so far? With City failing to pick up three points at Stoke, our grip on fourth place looks fragile. Victory over Liverpool would be a huge boost for Roberto Mancini as City seek to get back on track.

Recent performances have been unconvincing with the manager coming under scrutiny for his tactics and team selections. The report of a “bust-up” with Craig Bellamy is the last thing Mancini needed, even if he was able to smooth things over when speaking to the press.

Doubts over the wisdom of signing Patrick Vieira continue to mount following the Frenchman’s three match ban for a needless piece of retaliation. So much for experience and winning mentalities.

Elsewhere Tevez is still in Argentina, while Petrov has been ruled out for a month with knee trouble. Hardly the best preparation for a huge fixture.

Yet there is room for hope. We still have enough fit and available players to put out a strong starting eleven. City have raised their game when playing the big clubs this season and our home form is excellent.

In defence we have plenty of options, assuming Wayne Bridge is fit to return after being rested on Tuesday. Micah Richards should retain the right-back slot, while Kompany may challenge Toure and Lescott for a place if he’s fit.

Kolo should be happier against Liverpool than the aerial bombardment of Stoke. His pace would be better suited to keeping Ngog quiet. There’s a case for saving Kompany for the Cup replay, and letting Kolo skip that one.

With Vieira out, de Jong and Barry should be certain starters and will have to keep a close eye on Gerrard. Hopefully we’ll see two wide players enabling us to get at the Liverpool full-backs Carragher and Insua.

Personally I’d like to see Craig Bellamy given a run alongside Adebayor, where his pace could stretch the Liverpool back-line. Liverpool defenders would be more comfortable with the less mobile pairing of Adebayor and Santa Cruz.

If the Welshman’s fit Mancini may well start him on his usual left flank, though it would be good to Johnson given a run on his preferred wing with Wright-Phillips on the right. If Johnson is played in a floating role behind the strikers, then he could be crowded out by Mascherano and Lucas.

If Mancini wants to persist with a third central midfielder, then Ireland could play. Hopefully this wouldn’t be at the expense of width. Benitez is likely to have Liverpool set up in determined fashion and the game could easily degenerate into a war of attrition.

Rafa Benitez:

“They are an attacking team and we will have to attack too, so I think it will be open.” – Who are you tring to kid Rafa!

The ability of our wide players to get round the back of Liverpool, and for Adebayor to get on the end of some crosses could make the difference. With Kyrgiakos suspended, Carragher a doubt and Glen Johnson missing, putting pressure on the Liverpool back-line could prove fruitful. Mancini needs to do more than contain the opposition.

Nigel de Jong:

“It won’t make any difference who goes into the game above the other because Liverpool is always going to be a huge game and a match we will be giving our all to win.

“They are a huge club, one of the Premier Leagues ‘big four’, and as a player, these are the games you want to be involved in.

“We also have the added incentive of knowing a win will dent one of our main rivals for a Champions League spot. We have to prepare as we always do for our home games and aim to take all three points.”

In my previous article I described just how important a win could be if we’re to beat Liverpool to fourth place. It’s to be hoped everyone recognises this and we raise our game in a similar way to the home victories over Arsenal and Chelsea.

Blue Days line-up: Given, Richards, Toure, Lescott, Bridge, de Jong, Barry, Johnson, Wright-Phillips, Bellamy, Adebayor.

Prediction: 2-0 to City.

Why beating Liverpool still wouldn’t make City fourth place favourites

19th February 2010

This Sunday’s Eastlands clash between City and Liverpool has been billed as crucial in the race for a Champions League spot, and one which Rafa Benitez can’t afford to lose. If City do win, they would be four points ahead of Liverpool and have a game in hand.

On the face of it, this would be a commanding position for Roberto Mancini – but that assumes all remaining fixtures are of comparable difficulty. As we all know, the Premier League is anything but equal and fixtures vary considerably.

Aside from whether the opposition is Chelsea or Burnley, simply playing away often seems to much for City. Therefore I’ve had a quick run through the remaining fixtures for both clubs, and predicted the likely number of points to be gained.

This is highly subjective, as no football match is entirely predictable, yet I think it clearly shows City having the tougher run-in, even saying we beat Liverpool on Sunday. I’ve put the predicted number of points after each fixture.

Liverpool:

Man City v Liverpool – 0
Liverpool v Blackburn – 3
Wigan v Liverpool – 3
Liverpool v Portsmouth – 3
Man Utd v Liverpool – 0
Liverpool v Sunderland – 3
Birmingham v Liverpool – 1
Liverpool v Fulham – 3
Liverpool v West Ham – 3
Burnley v Liverpool – 3
Liverpool v Chelsea – 0
Hull v Liverpool – 3
Total: 25
Added to Liverpool’s existing 44 points gives 69.

City:

Man City v Liverpool – 3
Chelsea v Man City – 0
Man City v Tottenham – 1
Sunderland v Man City – 3
Fulham v Man City – 1
Man City v Wigan – 3
Burnley v Man City – 3
Man City v Birmingham – 3
Man City v Man Utd – 1
Arsenal v Man City – 0
Man City v Aston Villa – 1
West Ham v Man City – 3
Man City v Everton – 1
Total: 23
Added to our existing 45 points gives 68.

By the time our fixture with Everton gets rearranged it could be a dead rubber for Everton, while West Ham could be a lot trickier if they need points to guarantee their Premier League survival. I’d still go for four points from these two fixtures combined.

This shows that while our destiny is in our own hands, we are still going to need to put in some big performances and win some of our tough home games against Spurs, United, Villa and Everton. At the same time, there’s no room for results like the defeat to Hull.

Doing the same thing for Villa produced 67 points, so they’re still big players in the race. Tottenham on the other hand look least likely with a triple header against Arsenal, Chelsea and United likely to do for them.

One final point, doing the same predictions for the top three gave Chelsea 84 points with United and Arsenal both on 82. No wonder Arsene Wenger was so upset about losing to United and Chelsea the other week. The Gunners have by far the easiest run-in and could be worth a flutter if you’re that way inclined.

  • What do you think of the predicted totals? (I’m prepared for a great deal of disagreement on something so subjective)

Verdict: Stoke City 1 Manchester City 1

17th February 2010

Goals: Whelan 72 mins for Stoke. Barry 85 mins for City.

A game that had threatened to be tempestuous didn’t disappoint, with City fortunate to come away with a point after going behind to 10 men for the second season running at the Britannia Stadium. Last season this fixture saw a desperate City performance and this wasn’t any easier for those blues who witnessed it.

City’s starting line-up didn’t inspire confidence with Bridge and Wright-Phillips, the best two performers on Saturday, both starting on the bench. Apparently, Wayne’s knee couldn’t take another game in such a short space of time and Wright-Phillips wasn’t 100% fit either.

Richards came in at right-back and his physical presence was much needed as City conceded a host of throw-ins, corners and free-kicks in the opening period. With our defensive midfield trio of de Jong, Vieira and Barry, we were hopelessly deep and narrow.

Adebayor and Santa Cruz failed to gel as a partnership, with Roque looking well short of form and fitness. In between the defensive midfielders and the strikers was the lone creative spark of Adam Johnson. It was to much responsibility for the new signing, particularly with the poor pitch and close attentions of Stoke defenders.

For the opening 20 minutes, Johnson was barely involved as we allowed Stoke to pummel our goal. They managed a couple of chances, but in fairness the zonal defending just about held up. The Wearsider started on the right flank, which left us unbalanced, particularly without Bridge’s energy on the left.

The unmistakable figure of Vieira was often the centre of attention and the Frenchman soon drew the wrath of the Britannia crowd with a petulent boot into the groin of Whelan. It wasn’t much, but it was unneccessary and Wright-Phillips got a retrospective three match ban for less when we played here last season.

As the first half wore on, City started to string a few passes together, but with Johnson’s crosses failing to find the strikers, there was still little to cheer. Barry sliced one chance wide, while Santa Cruz fluffed a Johnson cross that did find it’s target.

Half-time came as a relief. It was to be hoped Stoke had thrown their best at us, and a couple of tactical changes by Mancini would see us pull a result out of the bag. It didn’t quite go like that, but we did get a potential break just before the hour mark.

Amdy Faye misjudged a through-ball and Adebayor looked to be getting away, when the Stoke captain brought him down. The linesman saw the offence and Faye was off. City finally started to press forward with some determination and Wright-Phillips was introduced for Garido.

This resulted in the high risk gamble of moving Barry to left-back. Given the problems Fuller had been causing us before, it was no surprise to see him target the England midfielder. This came to a head when a clumsy challenge from Barry saw them both go over in the area. Fortune smiled and the referee waved play on.

Memories of last season came flooding back however when the 10 men of Stoke took the lead. A poor pass from Johnson conceded possession to Whelan and the former City youngster hit a hopeful shot goalwards. Our normally reliable shot-stopper failed to get his body behind it, and Given conceded the worst goal of his City career so far.

The situation was now as desperate as City’s tactics. Balls were going into the Stoke box, but to little effect. The crosses weren’t good enough, there was no playmaker capable of a subtle pass, and the forwards looked unable to get the better of the Stoke defence.

Zabaleta came on for Richards, who presumably was feeling the strain of his recent injuries. Neither of the two right-backs showed sufficient ability to pick a pass with Zabaleta in particular conceding needless possession at a crucial stage in the match.

Eventually a lofted ball was flicked on by Adebayor for Barry to send a shot onto the post. He did well to adjust and knock in the rebound.

City were now going flat out for the winner, but still lacking guile. Petrov came on for Johnson, but once again failed to make an impact.

With five minutes of injury time signalled, there was hope of a United style winner, but this is City. Somehow in the final minute we found ourselves defending a Delap throw. Stoke threw the big guys forward for one last time and Shawcross nodded the ball in. Personally I felt Shay had been pushed in mid-air for the kind of foul that is normally given these days, but others thought the goal should have stood.

To lose in such circumstances would have been catastrophic. Despite moving up to fourth, a point still may not be enough for us to hold on to a Champions League place.

Roberto Mancini:

“We should have got it down the channels for Shaun or Adam, but too often we played it down the middle.

“We were too quiet at times and we had some good chances to win this game.

“We made mistakes but in the end we got a goal when we needed it. But this was two points less than what we wanted. Fourth is not a bad position, but it would have been better with a win.

“Now we must recover, I hope we can come back and win in the cup next week but tonight, we should have looked for two more points than we got.”

The Liverpool game now looks like a must-win given our remaining fixtures. We can be thankful that it will be a different type of game, and one our players should be more comfortable with. Rafa Benitez will no doubt have noted how we struggle when teams get “in our faces” so we should expect the kind of game they normally reserve for United.

For next weeks return to the Britannia, it’s to be hoped Kompany is available and selected alongside Lescott – the one player who came out of this fixture with any credit. In midfield, it’s time to ditch the defensive trio of Barry, de Jong and Vieira from the Mancini masterplan. Our Italian manager has a lot of work to do, and no more room for error.

External reports:

Blog reports:

Are play-offs for a Champions League place a good idea?

16th February 2010

News has emerged that the Premier League is considering a play-off system for the fourth Champions League place. This is a fascinating idea for those who want to see a break up of a ‘top four’ which has been formed on the back of Champions League participation.

The idea is to have the 4th to 7th placed teams in the league play off for the final Champions League place. This is the one that currently requires playing a qualifier to gain entry to the group stages.

There are a number of issues raised by the idea and it’s worth spelling them out:

How would it work?

This is yet to be decided, but the sensible method would be that employed by the Football League. The 4th and 5th placed teams could play the 7th and 6th respectively over two legs, with the higher placed teams having home advantage for the second leg. The final could then be played at Wembley.

Would Wembley want another play-off final?

You bet they would. With the cost of building the stadium to be paid off, they’re desperate for revenue generating fixtures. That’s why the FA Cup semi-finals are played there.

What about the Europa League places?

At present few in the Premier League really care about the Europa League. Personally I’d rather have good runs in the domestic cups which have the extra excitement of single legs and less seedings. However that’s a separate issue. It would make sense to give the losing finalist the Europa League place. If there’s two Europa League places up for grabs then there could be a Wembley play-off between the other two teams (a third place play off in effect). The only problem with that would be maintaining supporter enthusiasm. Who knows, maybe the Europa League will be turned into something attractive in the next few years.

When would it happen?

It could only come into place after the new TV deal has run it’s course in three years time. By this time, Platini’s plans to limit club spending would be in place. These rules will greatly reduce the chance of clubs outside the top four breaking in, as they would likely be banned from spending the same amount as those already in the Champions League. In this respect the play-offs could arrive just in time to save the competitive nature of the Premier League.

Are the benefits of Champions League football that great?

Yes, Uefa have just tried to play down the financial divide that is created by the Champions League in claiming it’s revenue “represents a small part, 8–13%, of Manchester United’s, Chelsea’s, Arsenal’s and Liverpool’s total turnover“. This is misleading as clubs participating in the Champions League are able to raise their global profile, thereby attracting more fans and higher paying sponsors. As City have found out, top players won’t join a club they don’t believe can get into the Champions League. Opening up access to the Champions League, may make better players more attainable for a wider number of teams. The benefits of Champions League football are huge.

Would clubs cope with the extra fixtures?

These games would be guaranteed sell-outs with large TV interest. With that amount of bonus revenue, clubs will find a way of coping with the extra fixtures. It need only be a maximum of three games each, however it could cause a headache for a team also involved in other cup finals.

Shouldn’t the Champions League be just for the Champions, rather than the 7th placed team?

Get real, the Champions League has long since stopped being just for Champions, and is never going to go back. Champions League is just a brand name – it’s not for Champions and it’s not a league. Liverpool have won it without ever being Premier League champions and also qualified after having finished 5th. The 7th placed team are unlikely to win the competition, but the point is giving other teams the chance of competing in what is in effect a European super league.

Will it inject some competition into the Premier League?

This is the biggest advantage for supporters. Liverpool are only being challenged this season thanks, in part, to the spending of Sheikh Mansour and Randy Lerner. If Platini bans this kind of spending while increasing the popularity of the Champions League, then it could become nigh on impossible to break into the top four. Richard Scudamore knows this and that’s why he’s against Platini’s proposals. It can be argued that making the Premier League less competitive would be a good thing for Platini – it would make the Champions League more attractive by comparison, and lessen the wealth of English clubs as the Premier League’s global following diminished.

Will English clubs be less successful as a result?

Some have suggested that having a lower placed team in the Champions League would reduce the quality of the English entry. Well maybe a little, but there’s still the top three in there, and it would surely be better than having the same four entrants year after year.

What if English clubs lose a Champions League place?

England only has four Champions League places on account of the success it’s teams have enjoyed in recent years. If this diminishes, then a Champions League place could disappear. The Premier League would then have to decide whether to scrap the play-offs or offer them for the 3rd to 6th placed teams.

What about the 39th game?

That idea may have to be sacrificed, but given it’s controversy, that’s hardly a drawback.

What are the chances of it happening?

Apparently the ‘big four’ are against it – maybe they don’t like the idea of a threat to their quadopoly – but the rest of the Premier League seem in favour. Changes to the Premier League require a majority vote of 14 out of the 20 clubs, therefore it could be a goer! In addition, Uefa don’t play a role in how European places are allocated within a country. They simply allocate the number of European places available based on their co-efficients.

Will play-offs be popular with traditionalists?

Not a chance, a play-off is clearly unfair on a fourth placed side finishing with much higher points than the team finishing 7th. Yet no-one can deny the excitement that play-offs generate. No City fan who was there will ever forget Gillingham ‘99. Club owners will have pound signs in their eyes, but there is also a bonus for supporters in having less dead rubber games at the end of a season.

Would it be good for City?

There’s no doubt that Sheikh Mansour is intending City to be in the Champions League regardless. However if Platini’s new spending limits adversely affect City, then it could be useful. It’s still to early to say that Sheikh Mansour is sure to turn us into a routine top three side. Funnily enough, if it were in place this season we would currently be a lot more relaxed and gearing up for the play-offs to come.

Conclusion

Play-offs for a Champions League place may not have the all or nothing excitement of the Football League play-offs, but they could liven up the end of the season. It would be another nail in football’s coffin for the traditionalists, and mean more razzmatazz for the Premier League that loves itself.

The real issue is keeping the Premier League competitive if Platini gets his way and limits the spending of clubs wanting to play in Uefa competitions. In such a scenario, the play-offs may be essential otherwise it could be a procession for the same top four clubs year after year. Even if City were one of them, that would make Premier League fixtures a lot less exciting.

  • What’s your view on introducing play-offs to the Premier League?

Preview: Stoke City v Manchester City

16th February 2010

Here we go again, only this time on a smaller pitch tailored to Rory Delap’s long throws and with a vociferous home crowd against us. Can City do any better than the much cricised performance on Saturday?

Yes they can. Having conceded to a Delap throw on Saturday, minds should be even more focused now. It ought to be remembered this was the first time Mancini’s zonal defending has been found wanting. Previously it has been very effective, particularly in the defending of corners which had become chaotic under Hughes.

Roberto Mancini:

“I think you will see a different game tomorrow night. On Saturday we played well in the first half, but we couldn’t find a second goal after taking the lead.

“The second half we were so-so, but we didn’t play too badly. We just made the mistake of conceding a throw-in from which they scored.”

The probable absence of Kompany is the biggest concern for a game at the Britannia. While it would be a major shock to see Mancini take Toure out of central defence, there is definitely a strong case for playing the more imposing Onuoha alongside Lescott. Boyata’s aerial strength is another option, but playing the teenager would leave us lacking in leadership.

Richards could also be set to return at right-back, which would be no bad thing particularly given the absence of Etherington on the Stoke flanks. Micah would give us another good header of the ball for defending set-pieces.

In midfield, Johnson is sure to return and Vieira is also tipped to start. With Ireland and Wright-Phillips both likely to be over their weekend knocks, the side could be quite similar to that which started on Saturday. Vieira for Barry would give the England midfielder a rest before the huge game against Liverpool at the weekend.

Wright-Phillips and Johnson could give us great attacking strength on the flanks, while Adebayor is likely to continue as a lone striker. As we saw on Saturday, it’s down to Mancini whether the Togolese becomes isolated.

We have the players to get forward and support him, but whether they are instructed to is a different matter. Playing Ireland is key to this, as a central midfield of Vieira, de Jong and Barry inevitably invites the opposition on to us.

If Adebayor fails to deliver against the big centre-halves, then expect to see another outing from Roque Santa Cruz. He did ok on Saturday, but whether it’s enough to make up for the absence of Tevez is another matter.

Bellamy is another who is considered a big loss, yet recently to much of his energy has been spent on supporting our left-backs. When it comes to attacking, Johnson could offer more of a threat on current form.

Shay Given:

“We’ll go to Stoke tomorrow looking to cause them problems and because it’s one of our games in hand, it’s vital we get a good result.

“If we want to finish in the top four and win the FA Cup, we have to overcome whatever Stoke, and any other team for that matter, can pitch at us.”

Given is right in that we need to get a positive result. Looking at the fixtures for the rest of the season shows Liverpool have a much easier run-in that could easily negate our games in hand. That’s why City need to go for the win.

Blue Days line-up: Given, Richards, Bridge, Onuoha, Lescott, de Jong, Vieira, A Johnson, Ireland, Wright-Phillips, Adebayor.

Prediction: 2-0 to City.