Player ratings: Manchester City v Liverpool

22nd February 2010

Given – One straightforward save was all that was required as the defence in front of Shay was outstanding. Did well with a series of tricky corners in the first half. 6

Zabaleta – Won some crunching tackles and looked to get forward whenever he could. A big improvement on his recent performances. 7

Kompany – A welcome return for big Vince and he totally dominated the penalty area. 8

Lescott – Looks to be back to full fitness and forged an excellent partnership alongside Kompany. 7

Bridge – A steady if unspectacular game. Defensively sound even if he didn’t manage many of the trademark attacking bursts. 7

de Jong – After the games against Stoke, Nigel looked glad to see the ball back on the floor. Provided an excellent shield, getting stuck into countless tackles. 7

Barry – As one paced as ever, but his form is improving and he retained good positional sense. It would have been good to see Gareth play some of the incisive passes of which he’s capable. They might have made the difference. 6

Ireland – Stevie took a lot of stick, but he was often crowded out. There wasn’t a lot for him to work with, as only the idiosyncratic Adebayor was ahead of him most of the time, and they’re yet to form an understanding. 6

Wright-Phillips – Looked like he was going to have a duel with Insua before Mancini decided to switch him to the left flank. Shaun looks lost over there and it was a shame he never got switched back. 6

A Johnson – Started brightly and was unaffected by the switch of wings. His close control is excellent, but the final ball was often a disappointment. Looked to tire badly in the second half. 6

Adebayor – Playing as a lone striker and target man, Adebayor won a surprising amount of high balls, particularly in the first half. Worked hard even if he wasn’t quite able to break free of the Liverpool marking. 7

Subs:

Bellamy – Came on to a big ovation and ran around but, in all honesty, nothing he attempted came off. Needs to rediscover his attacking form. 6

Ibrahim – A surprise call by Mancini. Abdi took a while to get up to the speed of the game, and it was a long-shot to hope he could make the difference in such a tight match. Managed a long-range shot just before the end. 6

Man of the match: All the heroes were at the back, and Vincent Kompany marshalled the lot of them.

Preview: Manchester City v Liverpool

19th February 2010

Is the visit of Liverpool our biggest league game of the season so far? With City failing to pick up three points at Stoke, our grip on fourth place looks fragile. Victory over Liverpool would be a huge boost for Roberto Mancini as City seek to get back on track.

Recent performances have been unconvincing with the manager coming under scrutiny for his tactics and team selections. The report of a “bust-up” with Craig Bellamy is the last thing Mancini needed, even if he was able to smooth things over when speaking to the press.

Doubts over the wisdom of signing Patrick Vieira continue to mount following the Frenchman’s three match ban for a needless piece of retaliation. So much for experience and winning mentalities.

Elsewhere Tevez is still in Argentina, while Petrov has been ruled out for a month with knee trouble. Hardly the best preparation for a huge fixture.

Yet there is room for hope. We still have enough fit and available players to put out a strong starting eleven. City have raised their game when playing the big clubs this season and our home form is excellent.

In defence we have plenty of options, assuming Wayne Bridge is fit to return after being rested on Tuesday. Micah Richards should retain the right-back slot, while Kompany may challenge Toure and Lescott for a place if he’s fit.

Kolo should be happier against Liverpool than the aerial bombardment of Stoke. His pace would be better suited to keeping Ngog quiet. There’s a case for saving Kompany for the Cup replay, and letting Kolo skip that one.

With Vieira out, de Jong and Barry should be certain starters and will have to keep a close eye on Gerrard. Hopefully we’ll see two wide players enabling us to get at the Liverpool full-backs Carragher and Insua.

Personally I’d like to see Craig Bellamy given a run alongside Adebayor, where his pace could stretch the Liverpool back-line. Liverpool defenders would be more comfortable with the less mobile pairing of Adebayor and Santa Cruz.

If the Welshman’s fit Mancini may well start him on his usual left flank, though it would be good to Johnson given a run on his preferred wing with Wright-Phillips on the right. If Johnson is played in a floating role behind the strikers, then he could be crowded out by Mascherano and Lucas.

If Mancini wants to persist with a third central midfielder, then Ireland could play. Hopefully this wouldn’t be at the expense of width. Benitez is likely to have Liverpool set up in determined fashion and the game could easily degenerate into a war of attrition.

Rafa Benitez:

“They are an attacking team and we will have to attack too, so I think it will be open.” – Who are you tring to kid Rafa!

The ability of our wide players to get round the back of Liverpool, and for Adebayor to get on the end of some crosses could make the difference. With Kyrgiakos suspended, Carragher a doubt and Glen Johnson missing, putting pressure on the Liverpool back-line could prove fruitful. Mancini needs to do more than contain the opposition.

Nigel de Jong:

“It won’t make any difference who goes into the game above the other because Liverpool is always going to be a huge game and a match we will be giving our all to win.

“They are a huge club, one of the Premier Leagues ‘big four’, and as a player, these are the games you want to be involved in.

“We also have the added incentive of knowing a win will dent one of our main rivals for a Champions League spot. We have to prepare as we always do for our home games and aim to take all three points.”

In my previous article I described just how important a win could be if we’re to beat Liverpool to fourth place. It’s to be hoped everyone recognises this and we raise our game in a similar way to the home victories over Arsenal and Chelsea.

Blue Days line-up: Given, Richards, Toure, Lescott, Bridge, de Jong, Barry, Johnson, Wright-Phillips, Bellamy, Adebayor.

Prediction: 2-0 to City.

Why beating Liverpool still wouldn’t make City fourth place favourites

19th February 2010

This Sunday’s Eastlands clash between City and Liverpool has been billed as crucial in the race for a Champions League spot, and one which Rafa Benitez can’t afford to lose. If City do win, they would be four points ahead of Liverpool and have a game in hand.

On the face of it, this would be a commanding position for Roberto Mancini – but that assumes all remaining fixtures are of comparable difficulty. As we all know, the Premier League is anything but equal and fixtures vary considerably.

Aside from whether the opposition is Chelsea or Burnley, simply playing away often seems to much for City. Therefore I’ve had a quick run through the remaining fixtures for both clubs, and predicted the likely number of points to be gained.

This is highly subjective, as no football match is entirely predictable, yet I think it clearly shows City having the tougher run-in, even saying we beat Liverpool on Sunday. I’ve put the predicted number of points after each fixture.

Liverpool:

Man City v Liverpool – 0
Liverpool v Blackburn – 3
Wigan v Liverpool – 3
Liverpool v Portsmouth – 3
Man Utd v Liverpool – 0
Liverpool v Sunderland – 3
Birmingham v Liverpool – 1
Liverpool v Fulham – 3
Liverpool v West Ham – 3
Burnley v Liverpool – 3
Liverpool v Chelsea – 0
Hull v Liverpool – 3
Total: 25
Added to Liverpool’s existing 44 points gives 69.

City:

Man City v Liverpool – 3
Chelsea v Man City – 0
Man City v Tottenham – 1
Sunderland v Man City – 3
Fulham v Man City – 1
Man City v Wigan – 3
Burnley v Man City – 3
Man City v Birmingham – 3
Man City v Man Utd – 1
Arsenal v Man City – 0
Man City v Aston Villa – 1
West Ham v Man City – 3
Man City v Everton – 1
Total: 23
Added to our existing 45 points gives 68.

By the time our fixture with Everton gets rearranged it could be a dead rubber for Everton, while West Ham could be a lot trickier if they need points to guarantee their Premier League survival. I’d still go for four points from these two fixtures combined.

This shows that while our destiny is in our own hands, we are still going to need to put in some big performances and win some of our tough home games against Spurs, United, Villa and Everton. At the same time, there’s no room for results like the defeat to Hull.

Doing the same thing for Villa produced 67 points, so they’re still big players in the race. Tottenham on the other hand look least likely with a triple header against Arsenal, Chelsea and United likely to do for them.

One final point, doing the same predictions for the top three gave Chelsea 84 points with United and Arsenal both on 82. No wonder Arsene Wenger was so upset about losing to United and Chelsea the other week. The Gunners have by far the easiest run-in and could be worth a flutter if you’re that way inclined.

  • What do you think of the predicted totals? (I’m prepared for a great deal of disagreement on something so subjective)

Verdict: Stoke City 1 Manchester City 1

17th February 2010

Goals: Whelan 72 mins for Stoke. Barry 85 mins for City.

A game that had threatened to be tempestuous didn’t disappoint, with City fortunate to come away with a point after going behind to 10 men for the second season running at the Britannia Stadium. Last season this fixture saw a desperate City performance and this wasn’t any easier for those blues who witnessed it.

City’s starting line-up didn’t inspire confidence with Bridge and Wright-Phillips, the best two performers on Saturday, both starting on the bench. Apparently, Wayne’s knee couldn’t take another game in such a short space of time and Wright-Phillips wasn’t 100% fit either.

Richards came in at right-back and his physical presence was much needed as City conceded a host of throw-ins, corners and free-kicks in the opening period. With our defensive midfield trio of de Jong, Vieira and Barry, we were hopelessly deep and narrow.

Adebayor and Santa Cruz failed to gel as a partnership, with Roque looking well short of form and fitness. In between the defensive midfielders and the strikers was the lone creative spark of Adam Johnson. It was to much responsibility for the new signing, particularly with the poor pitch and close attentions of Stoke defenders.

For the opening 20 minutes, Johnson was barely involved as we allowed Stoke to pummel our goal. They managed a couple of chances, but in fairness the zonal defending just about held up. The Wearsider started on the right flank, which left us unbalanced, particularly without Bridge’s energy on the left.

The unmistakable figure of Vieira was often the centre of attention and the Frenchman soon drew the wrath of the Britannia crowd with a petulent boot into the groin of Whelan. It wasn’t much, but it was unneccessary and Wright-Phillips got a retrospective three match ban for less when we played here last season.

As the first half wore on, City started to string a few passes together, but with Johnson’s crosses failing to find the strikers, there was still little to cheer. Barry sliced one chance wide, while Santa Cruz fluffed a Johnson cross that did find it’s target.

Half-time came as a relief. It was to be hoped Stoke had thrown their best at us, and a couple of tactical changes by Mancini would see us pull a result out of the bag. It didn’t quite go like that, but we did get a potential break just before the hour mark.

Amdy Faye misjudged a through-ball and Adebayor looked to be getting away, when the Stoke captain brought him down. The linesman saw the offence and Faye was off. City finally started to press forward with some determination and Wright-Phillips was introduced for Garido.

This resulted in the high risk gamble of moving Barry to left-back. Given the problems Fuller had been causing us before, it was no surprise to see him target the England midfielder. This came to a head when a clumsy challenge from Barry saw them both go over in the area. Fortune smiled and the referee waved play on.

Memories of last season came flooding back however when the 10 men of Stoke took the lead. A poor pass from Johnson conceded possession to Whelan and the former City youngster hit a hopeful shot goalwards. Our normally reliable shot-stopper failed to get his body behind it, and Given conceded the worst goal of his City career so far.

The situation was now as desperate as City’s tactics. Balls were going into the Stoke box, but to little effect. The crosses weren’t good enough, there was no playmaker capable of a subtle pass, and the forwards looked unable to get the better of the Stoke defence.

Zabaleta came on for Richards, who presumably was feeling the strain of his recent injuries. Neither of the two right-backs showed sufficient ability to pick a pass with Zabaleta in particular conceding needless possession at a crucial stage in the match.

Eventually a lofted ball was flicked on by Adebayor for Barry to send a shot onto the post. He did well to adjust and knock in the rebound.

City were now going flat out for the winner, but still lacking guile. Petrov came on for Johnson, but once again failed to make an impact.

With five minutes of injury time signalled, there was hope of a United style winner, but this is City. Somehow in the final minute we found ourselves defending a Delap throw. Stoke threw the big guys forward for one last time and Shawcross nodded the ball in. Personally I felt Shay had been pushed in mid-air for the kind of foul that is normally given these days, but others thought the goal should have stood.

To lose in such circumstances would have been catastrophic. Despite moving up to fourth, a point still may not be enough for us to hold on to a Champions League place.

Roberto Mancini:

“We should have got it down the channels for Shaun or Adam, but too often we played it down the middle.

“We were too quiet at times and we had some good chances to win this game.

“We made mistakes but in the end we got a goal when we needed it. But this was two points less than what we wanted. Fourth is not a bad position, but it would have been better with a win.

“Now we must recover, I hope we can come back and win in the cup next week but tonight, we should have looked for two more points than we got.”

The Liverpool game now looks like a must-win given our remaining fixtures. We can be thankful that it will be a different type of game, and one our players should be more comfortable with. Rafa Benitez will no doubt have noted how we struggle when teams get “in our faces” so we should expect the kind of game they normally reserve for United.

For next weeks return to the Britannia, it’s to be hoped Kompany is available and selected alongside Lescott – the one player who came out of this fixture with any credit. In midfield, it’s time to ditch the defensive trio of Barry, de Jong and Vieira from the Mancini masterplan. Our Italian manager has a lot of work to do, and no more room for error.

External reports:

Blog reports:

Are play-offs for a Champions League place a good idea?

16th February 2010

News has emerged that the Premier League is considering a play-off system for the fourth Champions League place. This is a fascinating idea for those who want to see a break up of a ‘top four’ which has been formed on the back of Champions League participation.

The idea is to have the 4th to 7th placed teams in the league play off for the final Champions League place. This is the one that currently requires playing a qualifier to gain entry to the group stages.

There are a number of issues raised by the idea and it’s worth spelling them out:

How would it work?

This is yet to be decided, but the sensible method would be that employed by the Football League. The 4th and 5th placed teams could play the 7th and 6th respectively over two legs, with the higher placed teams having home advantage for the second leg. The final could then be played at Wembley.

Would Wembley want another play-off final?

You bet they would. With the cost of building the stadium to be paid off, they’re desperate for revenue generating fixtures. That’s why the FA Cup semi-finals are played there.

What about the Europa League places?

At present few in the Premier League really care about the Europa League. Personally I’d rather have good runs in the domestic cups which have the extra excitement of single legs and less seedings. However that’s a separate issue. It would make sense to give the losing finalist the Europa League place. If there’s two Europa League places up for grabs then there could be a Wembley play-off between the other two teams (a third place play off in effect). The only problem with that would be maintaining supporter enthusiasm. Who knows, maybe the Europa League will be turned into something attractive in the next few years.

When would it happen?

It could only come into place after the new TV deal has run it’s course in three years time. By this time, Platini’s plans to limit club spending would be in place. These rules will greatly reduce the chance of clubs outside the top four breaking in, as they would likely be banned from spending the same amount as those already in the Champions League. In this respect the play-offs could arrive just in time to save the competitive nature of the Premier League.

Are the benefits of Champions League football that great?

Yes, Uefa have just tried to play down the financial divide that is created by the Champions League in claiming it’s revenue “represents a small part, 8–13%, of Manchester United’s, Chelsea’s, Arsenal’s and Liverpool’s total turnover“. This is misleading as clubs participating in the Champions League are able to raise their global profile, thereby attracting more fans and higher paying sponsors. As City have found out, top players won’t join a club they don’t believe can get into the Champions League. Opening up access to the Champions League, may make better players more attainable for a wider number of teams. The benefits of Champions League football are huge.

Would clubs cope with the extra fixtures?

These games would be guaranteed sell-outs with large TV interest. With that amount of bonus revenue, clubs will find a way of coping with the extra fixtures. It need only be a maximum of three games each, however it could cause a headache for a team also involved in other cup finals.

Shouldn’t the Champions League be just for the Champions, rather than the 7th placed team?

Get real, the Champions League has long since stopped being just for Champions, and is never going to go back. Champions League is just a brand name – it’s not for Champions and it’s not a league. Liverpool have won it without ever being Premier League champions and also qualified after having finished 5th. The 7th placed team are unlikely to win the competition, but the point is giving other teams the chance of competing in what is in effect a European super league.

Will it inject some competition into the Premier League?

This is the biggest advantage for supporters. Liverpool are only being challenged this season thanks, in part, to the spending of Sheikh Mansour and Randy Lerner. If Platini bans this kind of spending while increasing the popularity of the Champions League, then it could become nigh on impossible to break into the top four. Richard Scudamore knows this and that’s why he’s against Platini’s proposals. It can be argued that making the Premier League less competitive would be a good thing for Platini – it would make the Champions League more attractive by comparison, and lessen the wealth of English clubs as the Premier League’s global following diminished.

Will English clubs be less successful as a result?

Some have suggested that having a lower placed team in the Champions League would reduce the quality of the English entry. Well maybe a little, but there’s still the top three in there, and it would surely be better than having the same four entrants year after year.

What if English clubs lose a Champions League place?

England only has four Champions League places on account of the success it’s teams have enjoyed in recent years. If this diminishes, then a Champions League place could disappear. The Premier League would then have to decide whether to scrap the play-offs or offer them for the 3rd to 6th placed teams.

What about the 39th game?

That idea may have to be sacrificed, but given it’s controversy, that’s hardly a drawback.

What are the chances of it happening?

Apparently the ‘big four’ are against it – maybe they don’t like the idea of a threat to their quadopoly – but the rest of the Premier League seem in favour. Changes to the Premier League require a majority vote of 14 out of the 20 clubs, therefore it could be a goer! In addition, Uefa don’t play a role in how European places are allocated within a country. They simply allocate the number of European places available based on their co-efficients.

Will play-offs be popular with traditionalists?

Not a chance, a play-off is clearly unfair on a fourth placed side finishing with much higher points than the team finishing 7th. Yet no-one can deny the excitement that play-offs generate. No City fan who was there will ever forget Gillingham ‘99. Club owners will have pound signs in their eyes, but there is also a bonus for supporters in having less dead rubber games at the end of a season.

Would it be good for City?

There’s no doubt that Sheikh Mansour is intending City to be in the Champions League regardless. However if Platini’s new spending limits adversely affect City, then it could be useful. It’s still to early to say that Sheikh Mansour is sure to turn us into a routine top three side. Funnily enough, if it were in place this season we would currently be a lot more relaxed and gearing up for the play-offs to come.

Conclusion

Play-offs for a Champions League place may not have the all or nothing excitement of the Football League play-offs, but they could liven up the end of the season. It would be another nail in football’s coffin for the traditionalists, and mean more razzmatazz for the Premier League that loves itself.

The real issue is keeping the Premier League competitive if Platini gets his way and limits the spending of clubs wanting to play in Uefa competitions. In such a scenario, the play-offs may be essential otherwise it could be a procession for the same top four clubs year after year. Even if City were one of them, that would make Premier League fixtures a lot less exciting.

  • What’s your view on introducing play-offs to the Premier League?

Preview: Stoke City v Manchester City

16th February 2010

Here we go again, only this time on a smaller pitch tailored to Rory Delap’s long throws and with a vociferous home crowd against us. Can City do any better than the much cricised performance on Saturday?

Yes they can. Having conceded to a Delap throw on Saturday, minds should be even more focused now. It ought to be remembered this was the first time Mancini’s zonal defending has been found wanting. Previously it has been very effective, particularly in the defending of corners which had become chaotic under Hughes.

Roberto Mancini:

“I think you will see a different game tomorrow night. On Saturday we played well in the first half, but we couldn’t find a second goal after taking the lead.

“The second half we were so-so, but we didn’t play too badly. We just made the mistake of conceding a throw-in from which they scored.”

The probable absence of Kompany is the biggest concern for a game at the Britannia. While it would be a major shock to see Mancini take Toure out of central defence, there is definitely a strong case for playing the more imposing Onuoha alongside Lescott. Boyata’s aerial strength is another option, but playing the teenager would leave us lacking in leadership.

Richards could also be set to return at right-back, which would be no bad thing particularly given the absence of Etherington on the Stoke flanks. Micah would give us another good header of the ball for defending set-pieces.

In midfield, Johnson is sure to return and Vieira is also tipped to start. With Ireland and Wright-Phillips both likely to be over their weekend knocks, the side could be quite similar to that which started on Saturday. Vieira for Barry would give the England midfielder a rest before the huge game against Liverpool at the weekend.

Wright-Phillips and Johnson could give us great attacking strength on the flanks, while Adebayor is likely to continue as a lone striker. As we saw on Saturday, it’s down to Mancini whether the Togolese becomes isolated.

We have the players to get forward and support him, but whether they are instructed to is a different matter. Playing Ireland is key to this, as a central midfield of Vieira, de Jong and Barry inevitably invites the opposition on to us.

If Adebayor fails to deliver against the big centre-halves, then expect to see another outing from Roque Santa Cruz. He did ok on Saturday, but whether it’s enough to make up for the absence of Tevez is another matter.

Bellamy is another who is considered a big loss, yet recently to much of his energy has been spent on supporting our left-backs. When it comes to attacking, Johnson could offer more of a threat on current form.

Shay Given:

“We’ll go to Stoke tomorrow looking to cause them problems and because it’s one of our games in hand, it’s vital we get a good result.

“If we want to finish in the top four and win the FA Cup, we have to overcome whatever Stoke, and any other team for that matter, can pitch at us.”

Given is right in that we need to get a positive result. Looking at the fixtures for the rest of the season shows Liverpool have a much easier run-in that could easily negate our games in hand. That’s why City need to go for the win.

Blue Days line-up: Given, Richards, Bridge, Onuoha, Lescott, de Jong, Vieira, A Johnson, Ireland, Wright-Phillips, Adebayor.

Prediction: 2-0 to City.

FA Cup verdict: Manchester City 1 Stoke City 1

15th February 2010

Goals: Wright-Phillips 11 mins for City. Fuller 57 mins for Stoke.

Stoke came from behind to force a replay after comical defending had enabled Shaun Wright-Phillips to give City a first half lead in an FA Cup tie that left many City supporters frustrated.

To judge from the reaction of many, you’d be forgiven for thinking City were out of the competition. Having to negotiate a replay is disappointing, but the bigger blow was the Sixth Round draw that sends the victors to Stamford Bridge. Once again, if City are to get to Wembley this season, they’re going to have to do it the hard way by beating the best team left in the competition.

As for this game, the absence of Carlos Tevez enabled Mancini to send out a better balanced midfield. Stephen Ireland got the chance to play in his preferred role in front of de Jong and Barry. Petrov and Wright-Phillips were restored to their preferred flanks.

Mark Hughes’ preferred central defensive partnership was restored with Lescott partnering Toure. City started brightly with Wayne Bridge once again at the fore. Barry and Wright-Phillips were also showing more determination in front of the watching Fabio Capello.

For Shaun in particular, the pressure is on his place for club and country with the arrival of Adam Johnson. It was good to see him responding in the right way. Not only did he utilise his extra pace against Wilkinson, the passing was also up to scratch. His goal may have arrived in a comic manner, courtesy of Ryan Shawcross, but it was well deserved.

City failed to capitalise further as they once again sought to maintain a lead rather than pushing on to extend it. There were still chances, notably with a free-kick on the right of the penalty area, but Petrov was having one of those days where nothing he attempted came off.

Aside from a required block by Bridge, City were still looking comfortable until Rory Delap’s intervention. Mancini’s zonal defending has stood us in good stead against set pieces and everyone was disappointed to see the failings here.

Shay Given:

“It was disappointing to see we had ten players in the box, they had four and Fuller still had a free header.

“No one got near to him [Fuller] to put in a challenge. Certainly if we want to win the FA Cup and finish fourth in the league, then we’ve got to come out on top of that long throw and deal with how they play.”

Toure isn’t best suited to the physical questions posed by Fuller and Sidibe, and it’s hard not to conclude we missed the leadership of Kompany. Joleon Lescott dealt well enough with the aerial threat, but looked like he was still feeling his way back from injury when asked to deal with Fuller on the ground.

The better shape in midfield initially gave us a good attacking threat with Petrov, Wright-Phillips and Ireland all able to support Adebayor. Once ahead, however, the midfield sought to contain Stoke and the Togolese became increasingly isolated. Injuries to Petrov and Ireland forced changes in formation, but it was conceding the equaliser that really made City push for a second goal.

The onslaught took a while to arrive, but City did create chances as Stoke were pushed back. A Barry header was acrobatically saved by Sorenson, and Santa Cruz saw a shot cleared by Shawcross in additional time.

While many people expected to win this tie at the first attempt, it was never going to be a foregone conclusion. City have beaten Stoke 2-0 and 3-0 on their recent visits to Eastlands, yet on both occasions the Tony Pulis’ side showed themselves to be well organised and fairly solid. In some ways they were due a result despite their mediocre record away from the Britannia Stadium.

All the same, there wasn’t a great deal for City to be afraid of in the upcoming replay and league fixture. If we continue to defend corners well and regain our focus for Delap’s throws then that will be half the battle.

Despite the disappointment this was a better display than against Portsmouth or Bolton. With Lescott, Bridge and Santa Cruz all returning to fitness, there were positives to be taken. No doubt there are bigger tests to come and City will need to raise their game, but both the manager and squad are capable of that. It could well prove better to draw this game and win the league fixture than the other way round.

External reports:

Blog reports:

Video:

FA Cup player ratings: Manchester City v Stoke City

14th February 2010

Given – Mancini may have exonerated him for staying on his line for the Stoke goal, but it was still a poor clearance that gave Delap the opportunity to hurl the ball in. 6

Zabaleta – Some wayward distribution let the Argentinian down, despite some strong tackles that had Fuller complaining. 6

Toure – The high balls and physical test make Stoke difficult opponents for Kolo. The captain will need to be more assertive at the Britannia Stadium. Kompany would be a better option. 6

Lescott – Looked to be feeling his way back from injury as Fuller turned him to easily. However he dealt well with the high balls, which was essential given Toure as a partner. 7

Bridge – The man whom all media eyes are on. He didn’t disappointment, particularly in the first half when he carried the ball forward well and made a telling defensive block. Appeared to tire a little in the second. 8

Wright-Phillips – Having watched Johnson steal the headlines in the previous game, this was a big match for Shaun and he delivered. His pace was to much for Stoke and his passing was up to standard. In front of the watching Capello he certainly did better than Ryan Shawcross who managed a bizzarre assist for our goal. 8

Ireland – His presence gave the midfield a much better balance, even if he didn’t dominate the game. There were some decent touches and he managed to set Shaun on his way for the goal. 7

Barry – A big improvement on recent performances. Was it the watching Capello, or the prospect of winning some silverware that got him moving? Either way it was a relief to see him putting in a good shift and the passing was better to. 7

De Jong – Did ok without ever dominating as Stoke sought to bypass the Dutchman. His presence will be required more in the upcoming trips to the Britannia. 6

Petrov – One of those frustrating days where everything he tries fails to come off. It proved costly as some of the sharp shooting he produced in the previous round could have given us a crucial second goal. 5

Adebayor – Continuing to look a little more energetic under Mancini. He didn’t win enough as a target man against Huth and co, but was often left isolated when the score was 1-0. 6

Subs:

Vieira – Showed some touches of real quality, even if he does look to be feeling his way back into the English game. 6

Santa Cruz – Maybe Mancini was showing his sense of humour by bringing on a second target man and launching balls at Stoke. It nearly worked! Roque did ok on his brief run-out. He now needs to stay fit, as he’s a more natural target man than Adebayor. 6

Man of the match: Shaun Wright-Phillips

FA Cup preview: Manchester City v Stoke City

12th February 2010

City begin a double-header against Stoke hoping to progress in the FA Cup and push the Carling Cup defeat by United further into the distance. Tony Pulis’ side will be no pushovers after defeating Arsenal in the previous round, and the match promises to be more of a full-blooded spectacle than our last two league games at Eastlands.

Whether Roberto Mancini is quite so focused on the FA Cup remains to be seen. There’s a nagging suspicion that following the defeat at Hull and other lacklustre displays, the manager may now be prioritising the chase for a Champions League spot. Liverpool’s recent revival won’t have gone unnoticed at Eastlands, and three points on Tuesday may be considered more important than a cup victory.

Not that any supporter will see it that way when the game kicks off on Saturday. With United, Arsenal, Liverpool and Everton already out, the FA Cup remains a viable trophy to end our long wait.

Stoke’s away form is a pale shadow of that at the Britannia Stadium, but they are always well organised and are unbeaten in their last seven fixtures. If Mancini tries one of his more experimental formations, which often seem to confuse our own players as much as the opposition, then we could come unstuck. Pulis’ side were unlucky not to score on their last two visits to Eastlands and the Cup environment should see them offer a more attacking outlook.

Tony Pulis:

“I am looking to pick a positive team and go there to have a right go. The game on Saturday is an important one for us and the 5,000 or 6,000 supporters who will make the trip.

“They will want to see the team have a go and we’ll want to give it a go. If you can catch it right it is a knockout competition and a one-off game.”

Kolo Toure is supposedly fit to play and Micah Richards may be ok, but that doesn’t make up for the loss of Vincent Kompany with a groin injury. Let’s hope he’s ok for Tuesday. Even with Toure fit, a centre-back pairing of Onuoha and Lescott might offer the greatest physical barrier. Boyata didn’t look the same player without Kompany alongside him at Hull last week.

Pablo Zabaleta was much improved against Bolton and could be given the important job of keeping Matthew Etherington quiet. Alternatively, Mancini may look to give Nedum Onuoha another run out at full-back.

In midfield the only certainties are that Adam Johnson is cup-tied and Craig Bellamy won’t be rushed back to play. Personally I’d give Gareth Barry a rest and pair de Jong and Vieira in the middle. If we go with a central midfield three, then it’s to be hoped Ireland makes the cut and is allowed to get forward and link with the attack.

It would be a rarity to see Petrov on the left and Wright-Phillips on the right, but one which most fans would welcome. For a time against Bolton, Mancini had Tevez on the left and Johnson on the right, with Adebayor as a lone striker. This would be another interesting formation; using a lone striker with Petrov/Tevez on the left and Wright-Phillips on the right.

In the last round Tevez was given the afternoon off, and he could be rested here if we look to bolster our midfield. Adebayor should play as he looks to continue the improvement in his form.

Roberto Mancini:

“I heard the fans singing Shaun’s name, and I am happy for him. He is a good player, but it is important that he keeps improving – not only Shaun but all the players, the whole team.

“Now I know all the players here very well, I know their qualities in my mind. I have to decide before a game if it is better for the team to play 4-4-2 or 4-3-3, whether to play Stevie or Shaun or somebody else.”

Mancini has sprung a surprise in the previous rounds of the Cup so don’t be shocked to see Taylor, Boyata, Sylvinho or Ibrahim given a game. Onuoha, Ireland and Wright-Phillips ought to be keen to stake a claim for future first team action.

Extensive changes would be a high risk strategy against a full strength Stoke side who overran a mix’n'match Arsenal team. It’s to be hoped that Mancini once again gets the balance right, and keeps enough in store to win three points next Tuesday.

Blue Days line-up: Given, Zabaleta, Bridge, Onuoha, Lescott, de Jong, Vieira, Petrov, Wright-Phillips, Tevez, Adebayor.

Prediction: 3-1 to City.

Verdict: Manchester City 2 Bolton Wanderers 0

11th February 2010

Goals: Tevez 30 mins, Adebayor 73 mins for City.

City emerged with three points thanks to moments of brilliance from Adam Johnson and Emmanual Adebayor, along with a defensive mindset that achieved a clean sheet. Like the previous two games it was far from pretty as this time Roberto Mancini sought to shore up the midfield with de Jong, Barry and Vieira.

The defence lined up as expected, given that Kompany was fit and Micah Richards wasn’t. With Tevez and Adebayor the established strike pairing, all eyes were on the midfield. Mancini went conservative, with Adam Johnson as the single attack minded player against a Bolton side that played only one defensive midfielder and was missing several first choice defenders.

We started with a midfield diamond – de Jong at the base and Johnson at the tip. Asking Barry and Vieira to do the legwork on the sides was never going to work for long. In fairness we started quite brightly as the formation caught Bolton out. Bridge was enjoying the freedom of the left flank and nearly created chances for Tevez and Adebayor. However it fizzled out and Bolton started to see more of the ball.

Mancini made one of his now customary formation changes with Johnson moving over to the right and Tevez nominally on the left. In reality Bridge was being asked to patrol the whole flank and didn’t last the 90 minutes. The switch still worked ok as Johnson demonstrated his skills wonderfully on the right flank.

There is definitely a sense of a younger Martin Petrov about the Wearsider, with the big difference being his happiness to play on the right flank. It was no surprise that the first goal came courtesy of a Johnson run, as he induced a clumsy foul from Robinson.

Tevez sent his penalty straight down the middle once again and was fortunate to see it go in off Jaaskelainen.  The Argentine is going to need to bring a bit more variety to his penalty taking strategy.

As in the Portsmouth game, City sat back and Coyle’s trademark passing game started to tell, with Jack Wilshire in particular looking dangerous. Fortunately Zabableta was making up for a disappointing display at Hull and paid close attention to the Arsenal loanee.

Many eyes were on Patrick Vieira and understandably it was a mixed offering given his time out with injury. The positional play was fine, but those long legs didn’t always make the tackles and the passing was a little hit and miss. Obviously the pass for Adebayor’s goal was the highlight.

The other pleasing aspect was seeing him last 90 minutes, and he looked ok when we switched to a central midfield two following the introduction to Shaun Wright-Phillips. Prior to this Bolton had been dominating and the crowd were getting understandably restless. Credit to Mancini for opening the game out at this point by playing Shaun on the right and switching Johnson to the left.

Bolton had more to think about defensively and the game opened up. The extra space enabled Vieira and Adedayor to link up for the clinching second goal.

With Kompany back in the defence, we coped better with the physical threat of Bolton than that of Hull and saw the game out for a welcome clean sheet. Toure had a mixed game against Kevin Davies and there is definitely a case for playing Lescott and Kompany against the physical threat of Stoke. But would Mancini drop the captain? It shouldn’t be a major issue as all outfield players need to be rotated these days.

Likewise in midfield, if we’re going to play a central midfield trio, then there is a case for Ireland being one of them. De Jong is rarely permitted over the halfway line and neither Barry or Vieira have the legs. Ireland’s runs and link-up play would keep the opposition midfield from becoming camped in our half – not an enjoyable sight for most City fans.

Rotating Barry and Vieira would surely make sense as we seek to keep them fresh. De Jong could also do with the occasional breather.

One final thought goes to our frustrated wingers as Petrov and Wright-Phillips started on the bench once again. Shaun will be sweating on his World Cup place if young England aspirant Johnson continues to keep him out of the side. Shaun’s eagerness to get involved once he came on was tangible.

Vincent Kompany:

“We had to bounce back after the defeat at Hull and we did that in a really professional way I thought.

“The last couple of home games we have perhaps not won in style but we have done it with conviction. Two-nil at home is a convincing result and it gives us confidence for the FA Cup.”

With the upcoming two games against Stoke followed by Liverpool, Chelsea and Spurs, there’s no doubt City will need to play better in all those fixtures than they have in the last three. Finding a midfield balance that can accommodate both Tevez and Adebayor in attack seems to be eluding Mancini at the moment. At least the manager will now have a full complement of defenders to choose from, but we’ll still need to show a lot more to win the race for fourth place.

External reports:

Blog reports:

Video: